We may earn affiliate commissions from links on this site. Commissions never affect our scores or recommendations.
Our Commitment

Editorial Standards

How we maintain independence, accuracy, and consumer protection in every review we publish.

Our Mission

SupplementsTruth exists to provide honest, research-backed evaluations of dietary supplements. We cut through marketing hype to give consumers the information they need to make informed decisions. Our TruthScore system evaluates products on objective criteria—not on who pays us the most.

Our Core Editorial Principles

Independence

Our reviews are never influenced by advertisers, sponsors, or supplement companies. We do not accept payment for favorable reviews or higher rankings.

Transparency

We clearly disclose our scoring methodology, affiliate relationships, and any potential conflicts of interest. Our TruthScore breakdown is fully visible on every review.

Evidence-Based

We base our evaluations on peer-reviewed research, regulatory guidelines, and established scientific evidence. We cite sources and acknowledge when evidence is limited.

Consumer First

Every decision we make prioritizes consumer protection and education. We'd rather recommend nothing than recommend a harmful or ineffective product.

Our Editorial Commitments

What We Do

  • Research ingredients using peer-reviewed studies
  • Compare product dosing to clinical research amounts
  • Disclose all affiliate relationships clearly
  • Update reviews when new information emerges
  • Acknowledge uncertainty and evidence limitations
  • Use qualified language (may support, is studied for)
  • Recommend consulting healthcare providers
  • Apply the same criteria to all products equally
  • Cite reputable sources (NIH, FDA, PubMed)
  • Explain both benefits and risks honestly

What We Never Do

  • Accept payment for favorable reviews
  • Allow advertisers to influence rankings
  • Make medical claims (treats, cures, prevents)
  • Use exaggerated or miracle-cure language
  • Hide affiliate relationships from readers
  • Recommend products we wouldn't use ourselves
  • Ignore negative evidence about products
  • Copy manufacturer marketing claims uncritically
  • Review products without researching ingredients
  • Prioritize revenue over consumer protection

Our Research Process

1

Ingredient Analysis

We examine every ingredient in a product, researching its scientific backing, typical effective doses, and potential interactions or side effects.

2

Dosage Verification

We compare the amounts in the product to doses used in clinical research. Underdosed products receive lower scores, even if they contain quality ingredients.

3

Transparency Assessment

We evaluate whether the company discloses all ingredient amounts, uses third-party testing, and provides clear information about sourcing and manufacturing.

4

Claim Evaluation

We compare the product's marketing claims against available evidence. Exaggerated or unsupported claims result in score deductions.

5

Red Flag Screening

We check for concerning practices: proprietary blends, hidden fees, fake endorsements, and any FDA warnings or recalls.

6

TruthScore Calculation

All factors combine into our TruthScore, which is displayed transparently with point breakdowns so readers can see exactly how we reached our conclusion.

About Our Affiliate Relationships

SupplementsTruth earns money through affiliate relationships. When you click a link to purchase a product we've reviewed, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Here's what's critical to understand: Our affiliate relationships never influence our reviews or scores. A product with a higher commission does not receive a higher TruthScore. Products that score poorly are labeled "Avoid" regardless of commission potential.

We review products first, then add affiliate links if available. Many products we review have no affiliate program at all—we review them anyway because our mission is consumer education, not just revenue.

For complete details, see our Affiliate Disclosure page.

Corrections and Updates

We're committed to accuracy. If we make an error, we correct it promptly and transparently:

  • Factual errors are corrected as soon as they're identified
  • Significant corrections are noted at the top of reviews
  • Reviews are updated when products reformulate or new research emerges
  • We welcome reader feedback on potential errors or outdated information

To report an error or suggest a correction, please contact us.

Our Language Standards

Language We Use

  • "May support..."
  • "Is studied for..."
  • "Evidence suggests..."
  • "Some research indicates..."
  • "Is marketed for..."
  • "Traditional use includes..."

Language We Avoid

  • "Treats..." or "Cures..."
  • "Prevents disease..."
  • "Guaranteed results..."
  • "Miracle..." or "Breakthrough..."
  • "Doctor recommended..." (without verification)
  • "Clinically proven..." (without context)

This careful language reflects the reality that supplements are not medicines and should not be marketed as treatments for diseases.

Important: SupplementsTruth provides educational information only. Our content is not medical advice and should not replace consultation with qualified healthcare professionals. Always consult your doctor before starting any supplement regimen.

Questions About Our Standards?

We're committed to transparency. If you have questions about how we review products or our editorial policies, we're happy to explain.

Contact Us